![]() |
|
|
|
|
8 December Meeting: Building CodesTarget Corporation is a leading nationwide retailer with a mission: to be the preferred shopping destination for their guests and the workplace of choice for their team members. Target Executives will define their vision to make Target Corporation the "Best Company Ever". Take a look behind the curtain to see how Target is creating more total value for guests, team members, shareholders and communities in comparison to other companies through their use of store planning, design, and construction. The panel of Target Executives includes: Rich Varda, Vice President of Store Planning and Design, Architecture and Engineering; Dennis W. Anderson, Director of Architecture; Steve Makredes, Director of New Construction; and Ken Potts, Site Development Manager of the New England Region. Review the nature of retail history, survey the changes Target is currently seeing in the retail industry and find out what Target's position and role is in our economy. See examples of how Target store projects are incorporating new development concepts that can be compatible with a traditional Main Street. Witness an overview of their new prototype designs and be informed of the distinct advantages of the prototype process including how to get specified. Learn about the full service aspect of Target's building services team. Investigate Target's procurement process, how Target buys, and competitive sourcing. Find out about Target's efforts to integrate new matches between business-savvy and environmentally sound practices that will result in win/win responses. Join us in investigating Target Corporation's persistent innovation to invest in and capitalize on new technologies, to delight guests and team members with innovative design, to create convenience with guest-friendly store environments, to drive change through continuous process improvement and to deal responsibly with our environment. All attendees must pre-register no later than December 5th; walk-ins will not be accepted and identification will be required. Target Headquarters is completely accessible. Guests will be escorted from the security desks to the Auditorium meeting location. Parking locations 11:30-12:00 - Sign in / Registration Location: Chapter CSI Members: Free Non-Members:
$35 Cancellation Policy: All cancellations must be made no less than 72 hours in advance of the meeting. All cancellations made in less than 72 hours, including no-shows, will be charged $25 for dinner. January Meeting: Pantages Theater TourPatrick Thibaudeau and Ginny Lackovic from HGA will be presenting the lunch presentation at Solera Restaurant. Tom Hoch from Historic Theatre Group (the facility manager) will host the 45-minute 2:00 tour of Pantages Theatre. The audio-visual equipment is to be provided by Solera as part of their service. The Minneapolis Pantages Theater, constructed in 1916 was one of 30 theaters owned by Alexander Pantages. The Beax-arts style vaudeville theater was designed by B. Marcus Priteca who based the design on a small French Baroque theater located in Versailles. Adding to the mystique of the theater, mural painter Anthony Heinsbergen had his first redecorating commission in 1922 at the Minneapolis Pantages location. 1959 brought renovation to the theater, after being acquired by Ted Mann. Mann turned the performance theater into a movie house. All the original ornamental plaster was covered over as not to distract the audience from the picture show. Through cold war architecture all of the beauty of the original design was disguised, not to be revealed till years later. After closing its doors in 1984, the space sat empty. 1998 the City of Minneapolis (MCDA) acquired the
theater from Mann. "In winter, icicles were hanging from the
ceiling," George Kissinger, MCDA Project Manager. The theater had
fallen into what appeared to be complete disrepair. Thanks to the
diligent and relentless efforts of the entire construction team, notably
HGA, Penn-Co and Custom Drywall, the renovation was completed. |
|
November Meeting Report:
|
Educational RoundupNot all of the following are co-sponsored by CSI, but many of them are worthy additions to your continuing education portfolio. Please take advantage of those you find interesting and accessible, and let us know your comments (at specifics lite) so that we continue to carry information from those institutions that do a good job of providing service to the construction community. Engineering SeminarsFundamentals of Engineering Review (E.I.T. Review) For engineering graduates who are preparing for the Engineering-in-Training exam. January 20-March 24, 2003 (Tuesdays) www.cce.umn.edu/engineering/civil_review.shtml Masonry Design and Construction Fundamentals Seminar Series This six-session series provides the most current information available about sound masonry practices. November 12, December 3, December 10, 2003; January 21, 28, February 4, 2004 www.cce.umn.edu/engineering/masonry.shtml Concrete Conference Learn how concrete construction concepts and technology are changing in response to challenges facing the industry. December 4, 2003 www.cce.umn.edu/engineering/concrete.shtml Refresher Course for Civil Engineers A ten-week course to help practicing engineers get back to fundamentals. January 20-March 23, 2003 (Tuesdays) www.cce.umn.edu/engineering/civil_review.shtml Structural Engineering Seminar Series This six-session series addresses specific structural issues and concerns involved in the design and construction of buildings, bridges, and other structures, and incorporates examples of various principles involved. February 25, March 3, 10, 17, 24, 31, 2004 www.cce.umn.edu/engineering/structural.shtml Audio Exchange and CSI University Distance Learning Sessions10 Dec. - "Registering Your Education Programs for Continuing Education Credits," led by Beverly Holton More information available at www.CSINet.org "Recycled Content" Defined…Ending Confusionby the San Francisco CSI Green Committee Most of us think we know what defines recycled content, but what you may not know is that single-attribute claims, such as "recycled content," are regulated by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC), and defined concisely by many other organizations. Architect, designer, specifier, general contractor, or owner should have a working definition of such terms as well. Scientific Certification Systems (SCS), based in Emeryville, California, has established a certification program to create standards and benchmarks for environmental claims, environmental preferability, life cycle assessment, and forest conservation programs (FSC). For example, within Environmental Claims, SCS has a scientific program for independently verifying the accuracy of environmental claims on products. When it comes to recycled content, you see claims like 50% recycled content, when it should be stated as either XX% post-consumer, XX% post-industrial, or XX% post consumer and XX% post industrial recycled content if it contains both. Here are SCS's definitions: Post-consumer waste: This is a product or package, which has been discarded by an individual, commercial enterprise, or other public or private entity after having fulfilled its intended application or use. Easy examples would be pop bottles, plastic bottles, and waste newsprint - lots of what goes in your recycling bin. Post-industrial waste: A material, which has been generated as a by-product of a given process, which has properties significantly different from those of the original material, and therefore in its current form, cannot be recycled back through the same process. Easy examples would be taking carpet mill floor waste and producing another type of flooring product, or any different product. In contrast, Industrial Scrap is not considered to be recycled. Industrial scrap: A material, which has been generated as a by-product of a given process, which has properties allowing it to be recycled back through the same process. Industrial scrap, referred to often as floor scrap by SCS, FTC or many other organizations. Why? Because the waste material, like scrap paper in paper manufacturing, is routinely swept up and put back into the same manufacturing processing. For projects registered for the US Green Building Council's Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design (LEED) Green Building Rating System, recycled content materials specified according to these definitions contribute to LEED Credits MR 4.1 and 4.2, Recycled Content. For more information on recycled content definitions and environmental standards, go to the Federal Trade Commission guidelines in 16 CRF, Part 260, Guides for the Use of Environmental Marketing Claims at www.ftc.gov/bcp/grnrule/guides980427.htm, or Scientific Certification Systems at www.scscertified.com "Or Equal"by R. L. Manders, CSI, CDT On a recent call to an Architect's office, I found the person that I wanted to see in tremendous discomfort. He was suffering from what appeared to be a severe case of chest congestion, with a terrible cough, and a splitting headache. His face was flushed, and it appeared as if he could be running a fever. He said that whatever was causing him this discomfort, it was a bad as it has ever been! Knowing this individual for many years, and also knowing that he usually favored a very liberal outlook on writing his Specifications, it was suggested that he should probably see "a physician or equal"! By his very own thinking, it would matter not if the person he saw was a "Doctor of Dentistry", or a "Doctor of Optometry" or a "Doctor of Psychology" or a "Doctor of Medicine". After all, a Doctor is a Doctor…aren't they all created "equal"? Strange as it would seem, when this suggestion was made, he really balked at the idea. He said that he was not feeling well, and he needed the best possible advice he could get! He further contended that the Dentist or the Eye Doctor or the Psychologist did not have the expertise to "mess with his body"….the best would be none too good! Isn't it strange that "Multiple Choice Specifications" are plenty good enough for his Projects? And isn't it strange that "or equals" are good enough for his clients? Then, why would not this thinking carry over into his own personal problems? Throughout the entire Construction Industry, there has been Manufacturers who have invested many thousands of dollars in research and development so that they could bring to the marketplace the very best possible product for a given application. Just as all "professionals" are not created equal, why then would a Design Professional feel that all Manufacturers are equal by listing six or nine or even a dozen in Part II of the Specifications by giving them all "pre-approval"? The logic and reasoning of placing a "Shopping List" in Part II of the Specifications is almost an insult to the intelligence of a discriminating Owner who chooses to pay the price for Architectural Services and the selection of products that have been "hand picked" for that particular job based upon the expertise of the Design Professional. Most Building Owners have not been to Architectural College, and feel it a wise investment to hire the knowledge and experience of those who have to guide them through the building process. Since the Owner who has a building under Construction is actually paying the salaries of all of us in the field of Construction, doesn't it then seem fair that they be given the "very best that they can afford"….rather than the Contractor's choice from a long "Shopping List" that will allow the use of the cheapest possible product? In the NewsBuilding Cost Modeling Makes Estimating Easy for Architects and EngineersThe RS Means models included in CostLink/AE are constructed of up to 75 separate assemblies, and each assembly comprises 1 to 25 tasks and/or material components. The models operate through use of a series of formulas that calculate the quantity of each assembly and the quantity of the member tasks in each assembly, based on a small number of key parameters such as gross building area and number of floors. These parameters, which are adjustable by the user, are used by the formulas to project assembly quantities such as exterior closure area, slab on grade area, roof area, etc. In practice, the user chooses a model category (Commercial, Industrial or Institutional), selects a specific model from that category, then chooses one of the exterior closure and framing alternatives offered by the software. Next, the user enters an estimated building size and length of perimeter. The other major building parameters can then be reviewed and adjusted, if necessary. Each model has an associated set of possible "Additive" items, which may or may not be appropriate for a particular project. The user simply enters a quantity for each item to be included. Another tab allows the user to select any of 700 different U.S. locations, enter an appropriate sales tax, and adjust contractor markups and other cost assumptions, such as the architect's fees. When this data has been appropriately adjusted, the preliminary cost information for the project is complete, and the user can print or preview a summary or a detailed cost estimate. It's also easy to add assemblies and cost items using any of the RS Means Assemblies and Cost Items provided with the software. The user can also experiment with alternative assemblies and building elements to investigate the effects on project cost. Building Systems Design, Inc. is the only company that provides the RS Means modeling capability integrated with a full-featured estimating system. Founded in 1983, BSD currently produces the BSD SoftLink suite of software applications for the architecture/engineering/construction market. In addition to BSD CostLink/AE, the SoftLink suite includes PerSpective for design criteria, BSD SpecLink for construction specifications, and BSD CostLink/CM for professional cost estimating. For more information about any of BSD's products, contact Bryant Hendricks at 888-273-7638 or bhendricks@bsdsoftlink.com. Information and software demonstrations are also available at www.bsdsoftlink.com. |